Showing posts with label Whale. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Whale. Show all posts

Monday 12 February 2018

Wing with Leading Edge Tubercles: Update 01


Tubercles (bumps) added to the leading edge of the aeronautic wings are a class of vortex generators. As shown in the Figure 1.
Figure 1, Modified wing geometry

Figure 2, Baseline wing geometry

The wing's cross section is NACA 0012. The dimensions used for this analysis were as used by [Chen, J. H., S. S. Li, and V. T. Nguyen. "The effect of leading edge protuberances on the performance of small aspect ratio foils." 15th International Symposium on Flow Visualization. 2012]. The flow conditions were reproduced from the research paper mentioned. In the wing with the leading edge tubercles, the tubercle wavelength was kept at two-thirds of the wing span. The tubercle amplitude was kept at half of the wing chord.

Computational fluid dynamics analysis was conducted to analyze the effect of the leading edge tubercles on wing performance. For validation of the numerical methodology, the lift and drag produced by the wing was compared to the experiments conducted for the mentioned research paper at 25 degree angle of attack. The forces calculated using computational fluid dynamics were within 7.3 % and 1.4 % of the experimental values, respectively.

The addition of tubercles at the leading edge of a wing creates a non-uniform pressure distribution on the wing’s surface, as shown in Figure 3. This non uniform pressure distribution and the changed wing geometry is responsible for the creation of a counter rotating chord-wise vortex pair behind each tubercle trough, as shown in Figure 4. To read more about non uniform pressure distribution, refer to Non Uniform Pressure Distribution.

Figure 3, Non-uniform pressure distribution. L-R; Modified Wing, Baseline Wing

Figure 4, Counter-rotating chord-wise vortex formation. L-R; modified wing, baseline wing. Notice the absence of vortex structures, represented by circles in the modified wing, in the baseline wing.

These vortices re-energize the boundary layer between them by carrying high momentum flow close to the wing surface, as shown by the dynamic pressure distribution in Figure 5, which leads to a delay in stall for the wing with leading edge tubercles, as shown in Figure 6. It can be seen clearly from both Figure 5-6 that the flow is attached behind the tubercle crest in the wing with leading edge tubercles while the baseline wing had stalled completely. To read more, refer to Counter Rotating Chord-wise Vortex Formation and Reduction in the Blade Tip Vortices, Delayed Stall and Reduction in the Span-wise Flow.

Figure 5, Dynamic pressure distribution around the wings. Top; modified wing. L-R; tubercle crest, tubercle trough. Bottom; baseline wing, same span-wise locations where the tubercle crest and trough is for the modified wing.

Figure 6, Streamlines around the wings. L-R baseline wing, modified wing.

Another effect of adding the leading edge tubercles to the wing is reduced span-wise flow and wing-tip vortices. The reason for this is that the counter rotating chord-wise vortices generated as a result of adding tubercles to the wing geometry act as a barrier to any span-wise flow, as shown in Figure 7-8.

Figure 7, Velocity flow trajectories. L-R modified wing, baseline wing. Notice the reduced size and strength of the tip vortex for the modified wing in comparison with the baseline wing.

Figure 8, Streamlines on the surface of the wings. L-R; modified wing, baseline wing. Reduced span-wise flow, (T-B of the screen), is clearly visible in the modified wing.

Thank you for reading. I hope this post added to your knowledge about tubercles. Next up will be the results of the counter-rotating configuration for the NREL Phase VI wind turbine. For verification and validation of the said wind turbine numerical simulations, refer to Verification and Validation.

Some of the reviewed literature:

[1] Watts, P., and Fish, F. E., “The Influence of Passive, Leading Edge Tubercles on Wing Performance,” Proceedings of the Unmanned Untethered Submersible Technology (UUST01), 2001.
[2] Fernandes, Irelyn, Yogesh Sapkota, Tania Mammen, Atif Rasheed, Calvin Rebello, and Young H. Kim, "Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Leading Edge Tubercles on the Wing Performance," Proceedings of the Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations Conference, Los Angeles, CA, 2013.
doi.org/10.2514/6.2013-4300
[3] Frank E. Fish, Paul W. Weber, Mark M. Murray, Laurens E. Howle, “The Tubercles on Humpback Whales' Flippers: Application of Bio-Inspired Technology,” Integrative and Comparative Biology, Vol. 51, No. 1, 2011, pp. 203–213.
doi.org/10.1093/icb/icr016
[4] Pedro, H. T. C., and Kobayashi, M. H., “Numerical Study of Stall Delay on Humpback Whale Flippers,” 46th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting and Exhibit, AIAA Paper 2008-0584, Reno, NV, 2008.
doi.org/10.2514/6.2008-584
[5] Fish, F. E., and Lauder, G. V., “Passive and Active Flow Control by Swimming Fishes and Mammals,” Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, Vol. 38, 2006, pp. 193–224.
doi.org/10.1146/annurev.fluid.38.050304.092201
[6] Weber, P. W., Howle, L. E., Murray, M. M., & Miklosovic, D. S., “Computational Evaluation of the Performance of Lifting Surfaces with Leading-Edge Protuberances,” Journal of Aircraft, Vol. 48, No. 2, 2011, pp. 591-600.
doi.org/10.2514/1.C031163
[7] Miklosovic, D. S., Howle, L. E., Murray, M. M., & Frank E. Fish, “Leading-edge tubercles delay stall on humpback whale (Megaptera novaeangliae) flippers,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 16, No. 5, 2004.
dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.1688341
[8] N. Rostamzadeh, K. L. Hansen, R. M. Kelso & B. B. Dally, “The formation mechanism and impact of streamwise vortices on NACA 0021 airfoil's performance with undulating leading edge modification,” Physics of Fluids, Vol. 26, No. 10, 2014.
dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4896748
[9] K. L. Hansen, R. M. Kelso & B. B. Dally, “Performance Variations of Leading-Edge Tubercles for Distinct Airfoil Profiles,” AIAA Journal, Vol. 49, No. 1, 2011.
doi.org/10.2514/1.J050631
[10] Ernst A. van Nierop, Silas Alben, and Michael P. Brenner, “How Bumps on Whale Flippers Delay Stall: An Aerodynamic Model,” Physical Review Letters, Vol. 100, No. 5, 2008.
doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.054502
[11] K.L. Hansen, R.M. Kelso, B.B. Dally, E.R. Hassan, “Analysis of the Streamwise Vortices Generated Between Leading Edge Tubercles,” Proceedings of 6th Australian Conference on Laser Diagnostics in Fluid Mechanics and Combustion, Canberra, 2011
[12] Shi, Weichao, Mehmet Atlar, Rosemary Norman, Batuhan Aktas, and Serkan Turkmen, "Numerical optimization and experimental validation for a tidal turbine blade with leading-edge tubercles," Renewable Energy, Vol. 96, Part A, 2016, pp. 42-55.
doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.04.064
[13] Ri-Kui Zhang and Jie-Zhi Wu, “Aerodynamic characteristics of wind turbine blades with a sinusoidal leading edge,” Wind Energy, Vol. 15, No. 3, 2012, pp 407-424.
doi.org/10.1002/we.479
[14] Ibrahim, I. H., and T. H. New, "A numerical study on the effects of leading-edge modifications upon propeller flow characteristics," Proceedings of Ninth International Symposium on Turbulence and Shear Flow Phenomena. Melbourne, 2015.
[15] Moore, K., and A. Ning, "Aerodynamic Performance Characterization of Leading Edge Protrusions," 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2016-1786, San Diego, CA, 2016.
doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-1786
[16] Ning, Zhe, and Hui Hu, "An Experimental Study on the Aerodynamics and Aeroacoustic Characteristics of Small Propellers of UAV," 54th AIAA Aerospace Sciences Meeting, AIAA Paper 2016-1785, San Diego, CA, 2016.
doi.org/10.2514/6.2016-1785

Update 01


Following are my publications relating to the subject of this post.

Butt, F.R., and Talha, T., "A Numerical Investigation of the Effect of Leading-Edge Tubercles on Propeller Performance," Journal of Aircraft. Vol. 56, No. 2 or No. 3, 2019, pp. XX. (Issue/page number(s) to assigned soon. Active DOI: https://arc.aiaa.org/doi/10.2514/1.C034845)

Butt, F.R., and Talha, T., "A Parametric Study of the Effect of the Leading-Edge Tubercles Geometry on the Performance of Aeronautic Propeller using Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD)," Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering, Vol. 2, Newswood Limited, Hong Kong, 2018, pp. 586-595, (active link: http://www.iaeng.org/publication/WCE2018/WCE2018_pp586-595.pdf).

Butt, F.R., and Talha, T., "Optimization of the Geometry and the Span-wise Positioning of the Leading-Edge Tubercles on a Helical Vertical-Axis Marine Turbine Blade ," AIAA Science and Technology Forum and Exposition 2019, Turbomachinery and Energy Systems, accepted for publication.

Sunday 5 July 2015

Comparison between Lift and Drag Produced by a Legacy Wing VS a Wing with Tubercles (Humpback Whale Fin's Inspired)

* Link for Plots (now showing here for some reason) http://3dimensionaldesigningandmanufacturing.blogspot.com/2015/07/plots-for-comparison-between-lift-and.html

Following data was obtained from the CFD Simulations carried out in SolidWorks Flow Simulation Premium.

Project: Design of a Wing/Blade with Tubercles for Airplanes and/or Turbines


Without Tubercles

Air Speed in Km/h

Lift in N

Drag in N

150
46.307
14.775
140
39.942
12.917
130
33.432
11.057
                         120
28.807
9.498
110
24.234
7.928
100
20.593
6.625
90
15.836
5.352
80
12.482
4.205
70
9.411
3.243
60
7.272
2.406
50
4.873
1.680
40
3.130
1.082
30
1.763
0.612
20
0.810
0.279
10
0.231
0.072

 

 

With Tubercles

Air Speed in Km/h

Lift in N

Drag in N

150
50.616
11.360
140
48.131
10.008
130
37.190
8.505
120
30.988
7.309
110
24.784
6.079
100
20.892
5.094
90
17.225
4.146
80
13.412
3.287
70
9.955
2.507
60
7.444
1.849
50
4.955
1.286
40
2.991
0.828
30
1.652
0.468
20
0.725
0.212
10
0.214
0.057

 

Comparison between Lift and Drag


Air Speed in Km/h
Percentage Less Drag
Percentage More Lift
150
23.113
 
8.513
140
22.520
 
17.014
130
23.080
 
10.105
120
22.974
7.038
110
23.322
2.219
100
23.109
1.431
90
22.534
8.064
80
21.831
6.934
70
22.695
5.465
60
23.150
2.311
50
23.452
1.655
40
23.475
-7.523
30
23.529
-6.719
20
24.014
-11.72
10
20.833
-7.94
 
 
 
 

 

It is clear that the wing with tubercles not only produces more lift at a particular velocity but also less drag.

Data for the Wing without Tubercles:


Wing Span: 1.07 m

Chord Length: 0.229 m

Air Velocity: 0-150 Km/h head on

Vertical Pitch: 0 Degree

Gravity Considered

Fluid: Dry Air at STP

Mesh Settings: Coarse (3/8)


Data for the Wing with Tubercles:


Wing Span: 1.067 m

Chord Length Large: 0.229 m

Chord Length Small: 0.203 m

Air Velocity: 0-150 Km/h head on

Vertical Pitch: 0 Degree

Gravity Considered

Fluid: Dry Air at STP

Mesh Settings: Coarse (3/8)


Let's now take a look at visual representation of data.


This Plot Shows Air Velocity VS Drag, Lift by the Wing without Tubercles


This Plot Shows Air Velocity VS Drag, Lift by the Wing with Tubercles

As you can see from above two plots; the wing with tubercles generates more lift and less drag.


This Plot Shows Air Velocity VS Lift Generated by the Wings

The green line represents the Lift generated by the wing with tubercles. It is between two to six percent more at each velocity.


This Plot Shows Air Velocity VS Drag Generated by the Wings

The green line represents the Drag generated by the wing with tubercles. It is around twenty two percent less at each velocity.


This Plot Shows Air velocity VS Lift to Drag Ratio

It is clear from this plot that Lift to Drag ratio of the wing with tubercles is around thirty three percent more for the wing without tubercles at a velocity point.

 


This Plot Shows Air Flow around the Wings at 150 Km/h from the Right Side


This Plot Shows Air Flow around the Wings at 150 Km/h

The Need for Tubercles


In aviation there are four forces at play, Lift which over comes Weight and Thrust which overcomes Drag. For a cruise speed at a particular altitude, three of these forces are almost constant. Our goal is to minimize Thrust, Drag and Weight and maximize Lift, this is because Thrust costs in terms of fuel flow rate and Weight and Drag negatively impacts on the agility of the aircraft. Aerodynamically efficient Wings and/or Blades with "Tubercles" will not only increase Lift and but also decrease Drag. This all means that we will need less Thrust for a cruise speed than before, that results in savings in terms of fuel which will result in healthier environment.

 

Applications:


 


Canal Turbine Concept


It's a concept I am currently working on, so far I gave made a CAD model (renderings attached) of it in SolidWorks and analyzed it using its built in CFD module.

There are many advantages of canal turbines over wind turbines, prominent one's being:

 

Unidirectional flow


Water flows in one direction in a canal so we don't need pitch and yaw control surfaces. That simplifies the design process and reduces weight.

Constant flow rate


We (humans) control water flow rate through canals and it's almost same all year, so we don't have to worry about blade aero foil design to suit variable/abruptly variable flow rate, that makes design process further straight forward.

Large Electricity potential


Canals are 100s of km long, imagine the electricity potential in the canals. You can put these turbines in irrigation canals and it'll power nearby villages and all the irrigation equipment etc.

Higher Power/Discharge Ratio


Water is ~816 times dense (powerful) than air, so for the same discharge (flow) rate we get potentially 816 times more power. Which means more we can make designs that are lighter, smaller and easier to manage and maintain.

Easy maintenance


Fitted less than ~1 m deep inside the canal and can be retracted for maintenance at ground level, making maintenance very easy or better yet, we can maintain them while canals are being cleaned.